Continuing Insurance Coverage for Flap-Based Breast Reconstruction: Is There a Reservation Cost Related to a Woman's Abdominal Flap Choice?

BACKGROUND: The recent proposed alterations to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services regulations, although subsequently reversed on August 21, 2023, have engendered persistent concerns regarding the impact of insurance policies on breast reconstruction procedures coverage. This study aimed to identify factors that would influence women's preferences regarding autologous breast reconstruction to better understand the possible consequences of these coverage changes. METHODS: A survey of adult women in the United States was conducted via Amazon Mechanical Turk to assess patient preferences for breast reconstruction options, specifically deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) and transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap surgery. The Cochrane-Armitage test evaluated trends in flap preferences concerning incremental out-of-pocket payment increases. RESULTS: Of 500 total responses, 485 were completed and correctly answered a verification question to ensure adequate attention to the survey, with respondents having a median (interquartile range) age of 26 (25-39) years. When presented with the advantages and disadvantages of DIEP versus TRAM flaps, 78% of respondents preferred DIEP; however, as DIEP's out-of-pocket price incrementally rose, more respondents favored the cheaper TRAM option, with $3804 being the "indifference point" where preferences for both procedures converged (P < 0.001). Notably, respondents with a personal history of breast reconstruction showed a higher preference for DIEP, even at a $10,000 out-of-pocket cost (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Out-of-pocket cost can significantly influence women's choices for breast reconstruction. These findings encourage a reevaluation of emergent insurance practices that could potentially increase out-of-pocket costs associated with DIEP flaps, to prevent cost from decreasing equitable patient access to most current reconstructive options.

Outcomes of patients in rural communities undergoing autologous breast reconstruction: A comparison of cost and patient demographics with implications for rural health policy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with breast cancer living in rural areas are less likely to undergo breast reconstruction. Further, given the additional training and resources required for autologous reconstruction, it is likely that rural patients face barriers to accessing these surgical options. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to determine if there are disparities in autologous breast reconstruction care among rural patients on the national level. METHODS: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database was queried from 2012 to 2019 using ICD9/10 codes for breast cancer diagnoses and autologous breast reconstruction. The resulting data set was analyzed for patient, hospital, and complication-specific information with counties comprised of less than 10,000 inhabitants classified as rural. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2019, 89,700 weighted encounters for autologous breast reconstruction involved patients who lived in non-rural areas, while 3605 involved patients from rural counties. The majority of rural patients underwent reconstruction at urban teaching hospitals. However, rural patients were more likely than non-rural patients to have their surgery at a rural hospital (6.8% vs. 0.7%). Rural-county residing patients had lower odds of receiving a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap compared to non-rural-county residing patients (OR 0.51 CI: 0.48-0.55, p < .0001). Further, rural patients were more likely to experience infection and wound disruption than urban patients (p < .05), regardless of where they underwent surgery. Complication rates were similar among rural patients who received care at rural hospitals versus urban hospitals (p > .05). Meanwhile, the cost of autologous breast reconstruction was higher (p = .011) for rural patients at an urban hospital ($30,066.2, SD19,965.5) than at a rural hospital ($25,049.5, SD12,397.2). CONCLUSION: Patients living in rural areas face disparities in health care, including lower odds of being potentially offered gold-standard breast reconstruction treatments. Increased microsurgical option availability and patient education in rural areas may help alleviate current disparities in breast reconstruction.

Beyond Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Required Scholarship: The Academic Journey of Plastic Surgery Residents.

INTRODUCTION: Research productivity is an important part of required Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education scholarship during residency training and critical to trainees who intend to pursue careers in academia. This study aims to determine plastic surgery residents' experiences with and attitudes toward research. METHODS: Accredited independent (52) and integrated (86) plastic surgery program websites were manually searched for currently active residents' names and email addresses. Identified residents were emailed a survey consisting of 25 questions through Research Electronic Data Capture. RESULTS: A total of 45 plastic surgery residents responded to the survey request (14.6% response rate). Respondents were 57% female and 43% male, with an average age of 30.7 y. At the time of survey participation, 95% of surgery residents were involved in research endeavors, voluntarily or as part of their residency training. Of the respondents, 13 (32%) previously participated in a research fellowship compared to 28 (68%) respondents who did not. Interestingly, respondents who completed fellowships were 2.84 times (95% confidence interval: 0.52-15.38, P = 0.2269) more likely to intend continuing research endeavors after residency. Participants were most in agreement with statements suggesting their research fellowship benefitted their application in the plastic surgery match process (4 [interquartile range (IQR): 4, 4]), improved their ability to conduct research (4 [IQR: 4, 4]), and helped to better understand medical literature (4 [IQR: 3, 4]). CONCLUSIONS: Plastic surgery programs' robust research emphasis has a favorable translation into residents' self-perceived understanding of medical literature and clinical knowledge.

A National Analysis of Socioeconomic Variables of Access to Inpatient Body Contouring Procedures After Bariatric Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Weight loss following bariatric surgery often results in excess skin, which has led to a population of patients seeking body contouring surgery (BCS). This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of patients who underwent BCS following bariatric surgery using the national inpatient sample (NIS) database and to assess the demographic and socioeconomic variables of this cohort. METHODS: NIS database was queried from 2016 to 2019 using ICD-10 codes to identify patients that underwent bariatric surgery procedures. Patients who subsequently underwent BCS were compared to those who did not. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with receipt of BCS. RESULTS: A total of 263,481 patients that underwent bariatric surgery were identified. Of those, 1777 (0.76%) patients underwent subsequent inpatient BCS. Being female was associated with greater odds of undergoing body contouring (OR 1.28 95% CI 1.13-1.46, p = 0.0001). Patients who underwent BCS were more likely to have their procedure performed in large and government-controlled hospitals than bariatric surgery-only patients (55% vs. 50%, p < 0.0001, and 11% vs. 9.4%, respectively). Higher-income did not impose higher odds of receiving BCS compared to lowest income quartile (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.86-1.16, p = 0.99066). Lastly, compared to Medicare holders, self-payers (OR 3.5, 95% CI 2.83-4.30, p < 0.0001) or private insurance (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.09-1.40, p = 0.001) had greater odds of undergoing BCS. CONCLUSIONS: There is a gap in access to BCS procedures, with cost and insurance coverage being the principal barriers. Developing policies that allow for holistic evaluation of patients is crucial to improve access to these procedures.